I don't think so, but, I'll retry to see if it does.
Unfortunately, the URL is not shown in the video. Did it change to https://keyhelp.example.com:4040/?
Search found 11 matches
- Wed 29. Jul 2020, 16:57
- Forum: Archive
- Topic: Changing SSL to a port other than port 443 makes Keyhelp inaccessible
- Replies: 12
- Views: 5047
Re: Changing SSL to a port other than port 443 makes Keyhelp inaccessible
- Wed 8. Jul 2020, 21:54
- Forum: Archive
- Topic: Changing SSL to a port other than port 443 makes Keyhelp inaccessible
- Replies: 12
- Views: 5047
- Wed 8. Jul 2020, 04:07
- Forum: Archive
- Topic: Changing SSL to a port other than port 443 makes Keyhelp inaccessible
- Replies: 12
- Views: 5047
Re: Changing SSL to a port other than port 443 makes Keyhelp inaccessible
KeyHelp does nothing more than writing all vhosts with the ports specified on "Configuration" -> "Webserver", and updates the ports.conf. If there is anything other blocking this port, like an other service this is out of scope of this function. Have you checked an other port? Y...
- Fri 3. Jul 2020, 18:01
- Forum: Archive
- Topic: Changing SSL to a port other than port 443 makes Keyhelp inaccessible
- Replies: 12
- Views: 5047
Re: Changing SSL to a port other than port 443 makes Keyhelp inaccessible
I just tried on a fresh Ubuntu O.S, and I still have the same issue. When I check the service using the port 4443, I got this: user@panel: sudo lsof -i:4443 COMMAND PID USER FD TYPE DEVICE SIZE/OFF NODE NAME apache2 6154 root 6u IPv6 49126 0t0 TCP *:4443 (LISTEN) apache2 6156 www-data 6u IPv6 49126 ...
- Thu 2. Jul 2020, 18:43
- Forum: Archive
- Topic: Changing SSL to a port other than port 443 makes Keyhelp inaccessible
- Replies: 12
- Views: 5047
Re: Changing SSL to a port other than port 443 makes Keyhelp inaccessible
Hello, then you should check the corresponding logfiles of Nginx and Apache. Thanks for helping out Florian, I have checked the log files, and it seems Apache couldn't bind to the port I set in the Keyhelp panel, here is the log: (98)Address already in use: AH00072: make_sock: could not bind to add...
- Wed 1. Jul 2020, 23:22
- Forum: Archive
- Topic: Changing SSL to a port other than port 443 makes Keyhelp inaccessible
- Replies: 12
- Views: 5047
- Wed 1. Jul 2020, 21:09
- Forum: Archive
- Topic: Changing SSL to a port other than port 443 makes Keyhelp inaccessible
- Replies: 12
- Views: 5047
Changing SSL to a port other than port 443 makes Keyhelp inaccessible
I was trying to configure Nginx as a reverse proxy for apache, so, far, I got it working with HTTP and HTTPS, the only issue I have is keyhelp was inaccessible after changing the SSL Port to something other than port 443. Here is my Nginx config: ## thisismywebsite server { listen *:443 ssl; # retur...
- Wed 1. Jul 2020, 00:20
- Forum: Archive
- Topic: Creating a Branded/Private Nameservers [SOLVED]
- Replies: 2
- Views: 4487
Re: Creating a Branded/Private Nameservers [SOLVED]
Thanks, I just tested this on my test domain, and I can confirm that this is the solution. So easy than Vesta , this panel is so flexible, one thing missing is Nginx, but I have already configured that manually.
- Sun 28. Jun 2020, 01:10
- Forum: Archive
- Topic: Creating a Branded/Private Nameservers [SOLVED]
- Replies: 2
- Views: 4487
Creating a Branded/Private Nameservers [SOLVED]
I am almost done with the migration from vestacp to keyhelp, the only issue I have is a way to create a branded nameserver. The way it works in vestacp is changing simply changing template to child-ns, and then setting ns1.domain.com and ns2.domain.com as nameservers. Where can I find a similar proc...
- Wed 24. Jun 2020, 12:41
- Forum: Feature Requests
- Topic: One-Click Application Installation: Request for ClassicPress Inclusion
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2370
Re: One-Click Application Installation: Request for ClassicPress Inclusion
Okay, thanks a lot, and I would be looking forward to that.
- Wed 24. Jun 2020, 04:25
- Forum: Feature Requests
- Topic: One-Click Application Installation: Request for ClassicPress Inclusion
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2370
One-Click Application Installation: Request for ClassicPress Inclusion
First of all, thanks for this awesome panel, you guys really did a fantastic job, it's sleek, intuitive, and awesome. It would be great if you guys could add ClassicPress to the one-click app section, I don't know if you are familiar with ClassicPress, it is the fork of WordPress (without Gutenberg)...